网站设计需要学什么软件,医社保增减员在什么网站做,wordpress wp_head(),wordpress评论可见内容文 | 自然卷知乎自古严师出高徒#xff0c;“天将降大任于是人也#xff0c;必先苦其心志#xff0c;劳其筋骨……”。然而#xff0c;这并不能作为审稿人走向“键盘侠”之路的理由#xff01;让我们这些卑微投稿人心里真是好凉凉#xff01;ಥ_ಥ 大家来看看#xff0c… 文 | 自然卷知乎自古严师出高徒“天将降大任于是人也必先苦其心志劳其筋骨……”。然而这并不能作为审稿人走向“键盘侠”之路的理由让我们这些卑微投稿人心里真是好凉凉ಥ_ಥ 大家来看看这些毒舌傲娇又搞笑可爱的人儿们都是怎么花式拒绝我们的重点审稿人说得都对我们实则心存感激一定认真改难以招架的编辑评论The results are as weak as wet noodles.结论跟湿面条一样软弱无力The authors are amateur.作者怕不是个兼职的It is a bit for me that authors have used Python statistical analysis instead of SPSS or Matlab as usual.Please,explain.本文用了Python而不是像通常用SPSS和Matlab处理数据为啥Did you have seizure while writing this sentence?Because I fell like I had one while reading it.你写文章的时候犯癫痫了吗反正我觉得我读的时候犯了Why chase a gene in this ridiculous organism?为什么在这种荒诞的生物里追求一个基因This paper introduce tools to answer questions which it dose not seem many people are interested in.本文介绍了些解决问题的工具然而人们并不感兴趣The English language ranks this manuscript among the top 5 worst manuscripts I have ever reviewed.这篇文章的英语水平可以排进我看过的最烂的前五I started reading this manuscript with much anticipation.But my enthusiasm was short lived.我满怀期待读这篇文章但热情很短I have rarely a more blown-up and annoy paper in the last couple of years than this hot-air balloon manuscript.我过去几年都没读过这篇像屁一样烦人的文章Figure3.This figure is silly.这图好蠢呐This paper makes no contribution.这文章有锤子贡献But now, there are over 1000 articles on this topic. But this author have not read a single.这个方向至少有一千篇文章作者没读过一篇Reject-More holes than my grandads string vest.拒了漏洞比我爷爷的背心上的网眼还多The biggest problem with manuscript, which has nearly sucked the will to live out of me, is the terrible writing style.这篇稿子审得我都想自挂东南枝了This paper is desperate. Please reject it complete and then block The authors email ID so they cant use The online system future.文章太差了麻烦封掉作者的账号以免他以后再投稿The writing and data presentation are so bad that I had to leave and go home early and then spend time to wonder what life is about.手稿和数据显示让我整个人都不好了不得不提前下班开始怀疑人生The presentation is of a standard that I would reject from an undergraduate student.(就算回到本科时期我也会拒掉这种文章)Its hard for me to understand why it takes 5 authors to perform and describe one simple experiment.我很难理解为啥需要5个作者来阐述这么简单的一个问题This was a possible candidate for me the worst use of statistics to substantiate and falsehood award.这篇文章可以竞选一下瞎鸡儿统计学得出错误结论奖If I had known this would be sucj an easy one to review(reject!), I would have done it earlier instead of waiting for my dog to have a baby.拒了早晓得审稿如此简单我就该早做了而不是等我狗生完万能回复模板后台回复关键词【入群】加入卖萌屋NLP/IR/Rec与求职讨论群后台回复关键词【顶会】获取ACL、CIKM等各大顶会论文集